Trevor Osbourn wrote:I gather that Appleworks is on the way out Why?it is brilliant and as far as I can see, the suggested successor - iWorks - provides less facilities and is meant for dimbos. What do I do with my Appleworks databases, for example?
Keep using them?
Apple has declared EOL for AppleWorks, meaning Apple will no longer sell the application, nor will they support it. That's not very different from the situation for the past couple of years.
User to User support is still available here, at Apple's Discussions site, and in a number of other forums, and likely will continue to be available as long as there's a demand.
It doesn't mean the application will suddenly stop working. Continue to use it for as long as it fits your needs. Make sure, against the day that your copy becomes corrupted, that you have made a backup of the AppleWorks 6 folder and its contents, and continue to back up your data files regularly.
For db files especialy, backup with copies of the files themselves as well as with a copy of the data exported to a text file.
As for iWork (no 's') having fewer 'facilities' and being "meant for dimbos," that's a moot point which, as a non-user (so far), I'm not prepared to argue. Certainly Keynote goes far beyond the presentation capabilities of AppleWorks. Pages has won adoption of a number of people who continue to use AppleWorks, but now do almost all their word processing and page layout in Pages. The bumpf on Numbers makes it look pretty good, although I'd like to see a full function list before making any comment.
For people (like me) comfortable with AppleWorks, it's difficult to see "different" (which the iWork applications are), and not read that as "not as good" (which doesn't appear to be totally the case).
The lack of a database function in the iWork package keeps me from dropping AppleWorks in favour of iWork, and has me looking for a replacement with the simplicity and power of AW's db module.
There seem to be a number of applications or suites available with full relational db capabilities, but going relational incurs a rather hefty learning curve—one that I don't know I'm ready to attempt.
Regards,
Barry